Thursday, July 29, 2010
Some updates
Good news!
The Red-bellied Woodpecker has at least one successful fledgling! We have observed the adult male feeding the fledgling. We don't have a picture of it yet- the fledgling was high up in the trees and then it was flying around in circles! Pretty cute and since these are my favourite feeder birds, I'm always so happy to see the next generation come along. Hopefully there may be more than one. Our first year here, we saw the adults feeding 3 babies up in the tree.
There are also high numbers of Grackles congregating in the yard. Last night, there were over 40. The massive black bird flocks will start to get together soon for fall migration. I love watching the mass of birds work their way through the skies.
Disappointing news:
Still no updates on the Bobolink vs the Development situation. I haven't heard back from our local councillor who was trying to track down a wildlife inventory of the area in question. I did not hear back from BSC or the gov't. I did receive a reply from someone my email was sent off to (I suspect from someone linked with a local naturalist group- I emailed three in the area). The person did not have a title in her email and just said yes, they are at-risk and there is probably nothing to do if the area is slated for development. Not very encouraging. I have not seen a Bobolink in the area since late May/early June. I have not seen any evidence of nesting, but again, I am no expert in that and some of the fields have since been cut.
Friday, July 23, 2010
Recent bird count
It's been awhile since I posted a bird count list. Here are our numbers from Sunday, July 18th of birds observed in our yard. Since there are so many juveniles/fledglings this time of year, we may have recorded some as females since it can be hard to distinguish with some species.
House Wren- 1 male
Red-winged Blackbird- 1 juv., 12 adult males
Bluejays- 6 (including one fledgling demanding food from the others)
Grackles- 9
Cowbirds - 10 m, 9 f
Starlings-7
Mourning Doves- 6
Rose-breasted Grosbeaks- 1M, 1F (we usually see more- this could have been an off day)
House Sparrows- 2M, 4F/Juv
Am Robin- 1
N. Flicker- 1M, 1F (unusual for us to see one in the yard, never mind two!)
Baltimore Oriole - 1 adult, 1 juv.
Downy Woodpecker- 1M, 1F
Gold Finch- 1M, 1F
House Finch- 3M, 3F
Red-breasted Nuthatch- 1
Chipping Sparrow- 1
White-breasted Nuthatch- 1
Cardinal- 1F
Ruby-throated Hummingbird - 1M, 1F
Hairy Woodpecker- 1F
Barn Swallows - 4
Tree Swallows- 5
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Decline in farms = Decline in fields = Further loss of habitat
GTA farms on decline
Dennis Smith, SPECIAL TO THE CHAMPION * Jul 15, 2010 - 4:00 PM
Shrinking farmland is posing a growing challenge for Halton and other Greater Toronto Area (GTA) communities, a Halton committee was told last week.
“The number of farms in the GTA is continuing to decline at a consistent rate,” said Margaret Walton of Planscape. “The trend is to larger farms.”
The consultant outlined a study of GTA agriculture to the planning and public works committee. The presentation was made on behalf of the GTA Agricultural Action Committee.
Halton has an ongoing decline of farm acreage and half of its land that’s in agricultural production is rented, the study noted.
“The rate of rental land is quite high in the GTA and it’s highest in Peel and Halton. The cost of land is prohibitive,” said Walton. “A tremendous amount of land is held in the GTA for speculation and it’s put into farming to qualify for the agricultural tax rate. That’s a good thing.”
She said the problem is rental farms have short-term arrangements, so long-term farming like orchard and vegetable growing doesn’t occur.
Walton added there’s a lot of competition for land, with some growing areas considered prime for development.
The consultant said the provincial government needs to get involved.
“We need a policy on how to manage productive farmland,” said Walton.
She said she’s encouraged that numerous farms generate more than $500,000 annually, but added sometimes size is driven by commodity prices.
“The farms get bigger because prices are stagnating and they need to produce more,” said Walton.
Oakville Councillor Allan Elgar expressed concern about foreign ownership of local farmland and potential outsourcing of food products to other countries.
“It’s a huge issue in other countries and it’s happening here now and no one knows about it.”
Milton Councillor Barry Lee was unhappy about the effects of provincial legislation mandating long-term population growth targets for municipalities.
“The GTA and Milton in particular were picked as Places to Grow,” he said. “The issue here is the Province is talking out of both sides of its mouth about Places to Grow and supporting agriculture.”
He said he feels that Greenbelt legislation froze all the marginal land and opened up agricultural lands for development.
Walton said she believes agricultural lands were missed when the greenbelt was created, but there’s an opportunity to correct the situation.
“We have to finally get through to the Province that in order for agriculture to continue in the area, it has to be profitable and sustainable,” she said.
A low profile and an aging workforce were cited as some other challenges. The average age of Halton farmers is 55.5 years, secondhighest in the GTA.
Walton noted the GTA’s primary agriculture producers made a $2 billion economic impact in 2006
Dennis Smith, SPECIAL TO THE CHAMPION * Jul 15, 2010 - 4:00 PM
Shrinking farmland is posing a growing challenge for Halton and other Greater Toronto Area (GTA) communities, a Halton committee was told last week.
“The number of farms in the GTA is continuing to decline at a consistent rate,” said Margaret Walton of Planscape. “The trend is to larger farms.”
The consultant outlined a study of GTA agriculture to the planning and public works committee. The presentation was made on behalf of the GTA Agricultural Action Committee.
Halton has an ongoing decline of farm acreage and half of its land that’s in agricultural production is rented, the study noted.
“The rate of rental land is quite high in the GTA and it’s highest in Peel and Halton. The cost of land is prohibitive,” said Walton. “A tremendous amount of land is held in the GTA for speculation and it’s put into farming to qualify for the agricultural tax rate. That’s a good thing.”
She said the problem is rental farms have short-term arrangements, so long-term farming like orchard and vegetable growing doesn’t occur.
Walton added there’s a lot of competition for land, with some growing areas considered prime for development.
The consultant said the provincial government needs to get involved.
“We need a policy on how to manage productive farmland,” said Walton.
She said she’s encouraged that numerous farms generate more than $500,000 annually, but added sometimes size is driven by commodity prices.
“The farms get bigger because prices are stagnating and they need to produce more,” said Walton.
Oakville Councillor Allan Elgar expressed concern about foreign ownership of local farmland and potential outsourcing of food products to other countries.
“It’s a huge issue in other countries and it’s happening here now and no one knows about it.”
Milton Councillor Barry Lee was unhappy about the effects of provincial legislation mandating long-term population growth targets for municipalities.
“The GTA and Milton in particular were picked as Places to Grow,” he said. “The issue here is the Province is talking out of both sides of its mouth about Places to Grow and supporting agriculture.”
He said he feels that Greenbelt legislation froze all the marginal land and opened up agricultural lands for development.
Walton said she believes agricultural lands were missed when the greenbelt was created, but there’s an opportunity to correct the situation.
“We have to finally get through to the Province that in order for agriculture to continue in the area, it has to be profitable and sustainable,” she said.
A low profile and an aging workforce were cited as some other challenges. The average age of Halton farmers is 55.5 years, secondhighest in the GTA.
Walton noted the GTA’s primary agriculture producers made a $2 billion economic impact in 2006
Friday, July 16, 2010
Halton Conservation: Bat Night
Families invited to attend Bat Nights
* Jul 15, 2010 - 6:33 PM
MILTON CHAMPION - Did you know that crops such as bananas, avocados, vanilla and peaches rely on bats for pollination?
Though they’re often thought of as “creepy,” bats are beneficial in a number of ways.
Mountsberg Conservation Area will hold its annual Bat Nights on Saturday, July 24 and Saturday, Aug. 7 from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m.
Participants can get up close and personal with a live bat and watch as they drop from their daytime roost to begin their nightly hunting for insects.
This family event also includes a puppet show, storytelling and games, as some of the myths surrounding these little creatures are dispelled.
The cost is $15 for adults and $10 for kids 12 and younger.
Advance reservations are required. Call (905) 854-2276 or visit www.conservationhalton.ca.
Mountsberg is located on Milburough Line, 5 km west of Campbellville.
Bobolink Conservation Strategies
Thanks to Diane G for telling me about this article:
Songs of the Bobolink
Small changes on farmlands could help reverse the steep decline of a grassland species whose joyous chorus once filled the air.
By Cecily Ross
Every spring, the hayfields on our farm come alive when the bobolinks return. The spectacle begins in mid-May as the males gather in great swirling clouds, alighting on the telephone wires and the barely budding trees. A few days later, the females join them and a raucous, exuberant courtship ensues as the males, decked out in their backwards tuxedos, woo the females with the enthusiasm and showmanship of so many feathered rock stars.
For me, the bobolink’s joyous song – a bubbling cacophony of melody floating over breezy meadows (listen to it at http://wildspace.ec.gc.ca/media/sounds/bobo.wav) – is nature’s most eloquent harbinger of summer, evoking in a few bars of musical virtuosity the sweet, idle and seemingly endless landscape of my childhood. Those days are gone, of course, but not the bobolinks.
At least not yet.
One day last spring, I walked across the fields of our 36-hectare farm in Dufferin County with my birding friend Barb, through the thickening crop of timothy studded with buttercups and viper’s bugloss. She marvelled at the dozens of bobolinks putting on their noisy annual show, clinging to weed stalks and wire fences, puffing their neck feathers and spreading their wings, and then careening like low-flying planes over the waving grasses.
“Too bad they’re in such trouble,” she said.
“Trouble?” I replied, puzzled. As we stood there watching them, my bobolinks seemed undisputed masters of their domain.
“Bobolinks nest in the long grass,” said Barb. “In a few weeks, the farmer who leases your land will harvest this hayfield. And when he does, all the baby birds?” – she frowned and shook her head – “bobolink sushi.”
Thus began my personal campaign to save the bobolinks, if only the few that return each year to nest on our fields. The solution seemed simple: ask the farmer, my neighbour David Jones, to delay cutting the hay until the second week in July, by which time the baby bobolinks would be fledged and ready to fly. Not a farmer myself, I had no idea what impact this would have on Dave’s beef cattle operation. And because I anticipated that he would treat my request with the bemused resignation that he reserves for “crazy city folks” like ourselves, who have strange notions of country living, it took me more than a week to get up the nerve to make the call.
In the meantime, I learned a lot about bobolinks. First, I found out that the birds are in danger of disappearing altogether in a few decades if something is not done to protect their nesting grounds.
Bobolinks are grassland birds, which means that in Ontario they nest in hayfields and lightly grazed pastures. Originally denizens of the native grasslands of western Canada, the species moved eastward in the last century as their home habitat declined and the eastern forests were cleared for agriculture. Until the mid-1980s, bobolinks adapted well to the meadows and open fields of south and central Ontario. Today, the province supports about one-fifth of the world’s population of bobolinks, whose breeding range extends from central British Columbia to the Maritimes and in the United States from southern Oregon to western North Carolina. In fact, a map based on Breeding Bird Survey data shows the highest concentrations of bobolinks right in my own backyard: the farmlands of Bruce, Grey and Dufferin counties.
Things were going beautifully for the bobolinks until, in the latter part of the 20th century, agricultural practices changed. In particular, farmers began harvesting their hay more frequently and earlier. Today, cutting dates occur two to three weeks sooner than they did 50 years ago – in mid- to late June, right around the time that the bobolinks’ three to seven mottled, greyish eggs hatch and the tiny newborns are at their most vulnerable. According to the Quebec-based Migration Research Foundation, 96 percent of eggs and nestlings are now destroyed during early hay cropping, either killed by mower blades or scooped up by gulls and other predators when the protective grasses are cut.
Jon McCracken, national program director of Bird Studies Canada, confirms that bobolinks have undergone a “widespread and severe decline in past decades,” and the biggest drop in the last decade is here in Ontario. In the 40-year period between 1968 and 2008, bobolink numbers declined by an average of 2.6 percent per year, an overall decrease of 65 percent. Even more alarming is that the rate of decline has increased decade by decade. In the 10 years up to 2008, bobolink populations dwindled by an average of 7.1 percent per year, resulting in a 50 percent plunge in the number of this species.
“It’s a massive, massive loss in population,” says McCracken, adding, “We are seeing these sorts of declines in all grassland birds in North America.” The cause is the same for all the species: loss of habitat and habitat disturbance.
The plucky bobolink has the longest migration route of any songbird. In July and August, the males abandon their diet of insects and larvae that sustained them through the nesting season, shed their formal dress and take on the muted hues of the females as they all fatten up on seeds before embarking on the long, treacherous journey to their wintering grounds in the pampas of southern South America – a round trip of approximately 20,000 kilometres. On the way, the birds run a gauntlet of hazards, starting with angry rice farmers in the southeastern United States, where the species is known as the rice-bird and is shot and poisoned in the hundreds of thousands as an agricultural pest. In Jamaica, the seed-fattened bobolinks are called butter-birds and are hunted and sold in the local markets as food. Further south, the birds – back in their bright plumage – are prized for their beauty and effervescent song, and are caged as pets in the fashionable salons of Buenos Aries and Lima.
When I learned all this, asking my neighbour to delay his hay cutting seemed the least I could do. But there was a catch. “The nutritional quality of the hay declines the longer you wait [to harvest it],” McCracken tells me, “though with a delay of a just week or two, the decline is minimal.” Not enough to worry a beef farmer like Dave, but of some concern to dairy farmers whose livestock has higher nutritional needs.
The good news, according to McCracken, is that “by delaying cutting by one week or 10 days, you go from zero percent nesting success to a success rate of 80 percent or more. It’s a remarkable change, and it would be a significant thing for a farmer to do.” Many farmers, McCracken adds, are unaware of the toll early hay harvests take on these birds. That is why it is crucial to raise awareness about the plight of the bobolink and other grassland species, such as the grasshopper sparrow and eastern meadowlark (see sidebar at left), all of which are under pressure from changing agricultural practices. The Henslow’s sparrow, for example, has been reduced to fewer than 50 pairs in Ontario, and various groups are now fighting to save this small, shy bird.
“It would be good to get the word out to farmers and landowners,” McCracken continues. “I think a lot of farmers do care about birds. They are interested in being good stewards of the land.” Besides, he points out, “bobolinks are the farmer’s friend. They eat vast quantities of harmful insects and [at least in Ontario] they do no harm.”
McCracken suggests that a mechanism should be available to compensate farmers for any losses they might incur from delaying their harvest. To find out if such programs exist (in case my neighbour balked at my request), I called Andrew Graham, program manager for the Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association (OSCIA) at his Guelph, Ont., office. OSCIA disburses funding under the provincial government’s Environmental Farm Program. Graham said that while his group is committed to helping farmers protect wildlife habitat on farms – by offering subsidies to fence livestock out of woodlots and wetlands, for instance – it will not pay a farmer to delay hay cutting.
OSCIA distributes material on the impact of hay cutting on birds, but it stops there. “I have no problem at all with trying to persuade farmers to delay cutting their hay,” Graham tells me. “Our problem is coming up with a fair way of sharing costs [with the farmer] in something like this.” The only program he is aware of that might apply is one for upland and riparian habitat management under the Canada-Ontairo Canadian Farm Stewardship Program. This offers to pay 50 percent of the cost (up to a maximum of $20,000) to farmers wishing to take a portion of cropland out of production and convert it to native species of forest, shrubs or grasses.
“It’s not widely used,” he admits.” And then, almost by way of apology, he adds, “We can’t do everything.”
Given that the environmental bureaucrats were not addressing the well-documented decline of the bobolink, I was beginning to wonder if anyone besides me cared at all. I called my friend Barb the birder, and she suggested I contact her friends, Frances and Donald MacFarlane, who live on 30 hectares of derelict farmland near Shelburne, Ont. Bobolinks, Frances tells me, were there in great numbers 18 years ago when the couple purchased the property.
“They were such fun, so exuberant,” says Frances, that the MacFarlanes were disappointed when the birds failed to come back a few years later. “We asked around,” she says, “and decided that it was because the hay hadn’t been cut for a few years. So we decided to cut the grass once a year, in October, long after the bobolinks have gone – and sure enough, they returned in the spring.”
Apparently, bobolinks prefer habitat that is mowed regularly, just not during June, which, I was only too aware, was fast approaching as I worked up the nerve to call Dave and deliver my save-the-birds speech.
“It’s because of the bobolinks,” I explain to Dave after asking him to delay the hay harvest on our fields.
“Bobolinks,” he says. “Is that what you call them?”
To my delight, he seemed almost relieved by my request and proceeded to describe the way gulls follow his tractor, swooping in and plucking the helpless fledglings as their nests are exposed by the mower.
“I’ve always hated that,” he tells me.
And so last year, Dave delayed cutting our hay until the end of the first week in July. By then, the male bobolinks’ jubilant chorus was over; so was the hard work of feeding their clutches of demanding young. The males had begun to moult and were now almost indistinguishable from their mates. I had no way of knowing, as I looked out over the round bales turning golden in the midsummer sun, whether the baby birds had survived. But I like to think they did and that they will return in the spring, bold and beautiful and ready to begin again.
I know my land is not much – a few fields in a far corner of Dufferin County that hereafter will be a haven where a few dozen bobolinks can raise their young. But the effort is worthwhile, if only so that my as-yet unborn grandchildren may one day be able to lie in the long grass on a cloudless June day and listen to the bobolinks sing.
All about Bobolinks
Some facts about a fascinating bird: male bobolinks arrive in Ontario in mid-May and set about establishing their territories in open fields. Females join them a week later. Males defend their turf aggressively by singing and chasing away rival males. Actual physical combat between them, however, is rare.
Bobolinks are a highly dimorphic species – the males and females look very different. During the breeding season, males are a sleek black with a yellow head patch and bold white patterns on their backs. However, before fall migration, they moult into a nondescript striped brown plumage like that of the females.
Bobolinks are polygamous – a single male will often mate with several females in his territory. He will, however, help with feeding the young only in his primary nest. “Helper” birds of either sex (usually younger birds that have not paired off) assist in feeding the other nestlings. Bobolinks build their nests on the ground, hidden in long grass. The females lay three to seven blue-grey eggs speckled with reddish brown. Incubation takes approximately 13 days; hatching occurs between June 7 and 20. The fledglings leave the nest before they are ready to fly, at about 10 days old. They are not capable of sustained flight until they are 16 days old.
The summer diet of bobolinks consists mainly of insects, including beetles, grasshoppers, caterpillars, wasps, ants, spiders and millipedes. They also eat some weed and grass seeds. During migration, they feed heavily on rice and millet, and are considered a major agricultural pest in regions where these crops are grown.
The species is one of the few songbirds that have two moulting periods. One occurs on their wintering grounds in South America, beginning in late January, and results in the males’ showy spring plumage. The second moult takes place in late July, when the males revert to basic brown and white.
Grassland birds
With its distinctive song and plumage, the bobolink is the perfect poster species for the ongoing effort to protect North America’s grassland birds, many of which are declining steeply in numbers. In Ontario, the threatened species include the vesper sparrow, grasshopper sparrow, Henslow’s sparrow, Le Conte’s sparrow, sedge wren, horned lark, upland sandpiper, short-eared owl, eastern meadowlark and western meadowlark.
According to the U.S. State of the Birds, a comprehensive report produced in 2009 by thirteen U.S. conservation and wildlife agencies (including The Nature Conservancy), grassland birds “are among the fastest and most consistently declining birds in North America.” The main cause of their decline is loss of habitat. Ideal nesting grounds for these birds are the native prairie grasslands that once stretched across the continent. The birds build their nests – usually shallow open cups of grass and weed stems – on the ground, hidden among thick grass and weeds. In the past 100 years, however, 95 percent of the tallgrass prairie in North America has been converted to agricultural uses. Many grassland species adapted well to the hayfields, pastures and lush fallow fields that resulted, but intensification of agriculture in the past 20 years is taking a severe toll on their numbers, and species declines of anywhere from 37 percent to 78 percent have occurred since 1968.
How can you help? Spread the word and, if you are a landowner, take steps to ensure that hay cropping is delayed, ideally by a week to 10 days. Doing so will ensure that most of the fledglings have left the nest, preventing their almost certain death from the mower blades or predators. Any delay in cutting will benefit nesting grassland birds by increasing the percentage that fledge successfully.
To find out more about bobolinks
A good place to see bobolinks and other grassland birds in Ontario is at the Carden Plain, a rare alvar habitat where other endangered species, such as the loggerhead shrike and the Henslow’s sparrow, also live. The plain is located about two hours north of Toronto. Alvars are natural open habitats with thin soil over a rocky base. BirdLife International designated the Carden Alvar as an Important Bird Area (IBA). About 238 bird species, 450 plant species, 142 butterfly and dragonfly species inhabit the alvar. For more information and directions, visit the Carden Plain IBA website, www.cardenplainimportantbirdarea.com.
You can also learn more about bobolinks from these sources:
Bird Studies Canada: www.bsc-eoc.org
Migration Research Foundation: www.migrationresearch.org/research/grassland.html
Ontario Field Ornithologists: www.ofo.ca
Environmental Canada’s Migratory Bird Conservation: www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca/birds/trends/disclaimer_e.cfm
Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario: www.birdsontario.org/atlas/atlasmain.html
Canadian Migration Monitoring Network:
www.bsc-eoc.org/national/cmmn.html
Ontario Partners in Flight:
www.bsc-eoc.org/PIF/PIFOntario.html
North American Bird Conservation Initiative: www.nabci.net
Partners in Flight – U.S.: www.partnersinflight.org
Wildlife Watchers Programs: www.on.ec.gc.ca/wildlife/programs-e.html
Wildspace Ontario: www.on.ec.gc.ca/wildlife/wildspace/intro-e.html
Songs of the Bobolink
Small changes on farmlands could help reverse the steep decline of a grassland species whose joyous chorus once filled the air.
By Cecily Ross
Every spring, the hayfields on our farm come alive when the bobolinks return. The spectacle begins in mid-May as the males gather in great swirling clouds, alighting on the telephone wires and the barely budding trees. A few days later, the females join them and a raucous, exuberant courtship ensues as the males, decked out in their backwards tuxedos, woo the females with the enthusiasm and showmanship of so many feathered rock stars.
For me, the bobolink’s joyous song – a bubbling cacophony of melody floating over breezy meadows (listen to it at http://wildspace.ec.gc.ca/media/sounds/bobo.wav) – is nature’s most eloquent harbinger of summer, evoking in a few bars of musical virtuosity the sweet, idle and seemingly endless landscape of my childhood. Those days are gone, of course, but not the bobolinks.
At least not yet.
One day last spring, I walked across the fields of our 36-hectare farm in Dufferin County with my birding friend Barb, through the thickening crop of timothy studded with buttercups and viper’s bugloss. She marvelled at the dozens of bobolinks putting on their noisy annual show, clinging to weed stalks and wire fences, puffing their neck feathers and spreading their wings, and then careening like low-flying planes over the waving grasses.
“Too bad they’re in such trouble,” she said.
“Trouble?” I replied, puzzled. As we stood there watching them, my bobolinks seemed undisputed masters of their domain.
“Bobolinks nest in the long grass,” said Barb. “In a few weeks, the farmer who leases your land will harvest this hayfield. And when he does, all the baby birds?” – she frowned and shook her head – “bobolink sushi.”
Thus began my personal campaign to save the bobolinks, if only the few that return each year to nest on our fields. The solution seemed simple: ask the farmer, my neighbour David Jones, to delay cutting the hay until the second week in July, by which time the baby bobolinks would be fledged and ready to fly. Not a farmer myself, I had no idea what impact this would have on Dave’s beef cattle operation. And because I anticipated that he would treat my request with the bemused resignation that he reserves for “crazy city folks” like ourselves, who have strange notions of country living, it took me more than a week to get up the nerve to make the call.
In the meantime, I learned a lot about bobolinks. First, I found out that the birds are in danger of disappearing altogether in a few decades if something is not done to protect their nesting grounds.
Bobolinks are grassland birds, which means that in Ontario they nest in hayfields and lightly grazed pastures. Originally denizens of the native grasslands of western Canada, the species moved eastward in the last century as their home habitat declined and the eastern forests were cleared for agriculture. Until the mid-1980s, bobolinks adapted well to the meadows and open fields of south and central Ontario. Today, the province supports about one-fifth of the world’s population of bobolinks, whose breeding range extends from central British Columbia to the Maritimes and in the United States from southern Oregon to western North Carolina. In fact, a map based on Breeding Bird Survey data shows the highest concentrations of bobolinks right in my own backyard: the farmlands of Bruce, Grey and Dufferin counties.
Things were going beautifully for the bobolinks until, in the latter part of the 20th century, agricultural practices changed. In particular, farmers began harvesting their hay more frequently and earlier. Today, cutting dates occur two to three weeks sooner than they did 50 years ago – in mid- to late June, right around the time that the bobolinks’ three to seven mottled, greyish eggs hatch and the tiny newborns are at their most vulnerable. According to the Quebec-based Migration Research Foundation, 96 percent of eggs and nestlings are now destroyed during early hay cropping, either killed by mower blades or scooped up by gulls and other predators when the protective grasses are cut.
Jon McCracken, national program director of Bird Studies Canada, confirms that bobolinks have undergone a “widespread and severe decline in past decades,” and the biggest drop in the last decade is here in Ontario. In the 40-year period between 1968 and 2008, bobolink numbers declined by an average of 2.6 percent per year, an overall decrease of 65 percent. Even more alarming is that the rate of decline has increased decade by decade. In the 10 years up to 2008, bobolink populations dwindled by an average of 7.1 percent per year, resulting in a 50 percent plunge in the number of this species.
“It’s a massive, massive loss in population,” says McCracken, adding, “We are seeing these sorts of declines in all grassland birds in North America.” The cause is the same for all the species: loss of habitat and habitat disturbance.
The plucky bobolink has the longest migration route of any songbird. In July and August, the males abandon their diet of insects and larvae that sustained them through the nesting season, shed their formal dress and take on the muted hues of the females as they all fatten up on seeds before embarking on the long, treacherous journey to their wintering grounds in the pampas of southern South America – a round trip of approximately 20,000 kilometres. On the way, the birds run a gauntlet of hazards, starting with angry rice farmers in the southeastern United States, where the species is known as the rice-bird and is shot and poisoned in the hundreds of thousands as an agricultural pest. In Jamaica, the seed-fattened bobolinks are called butter-birds and are hunted and sold in the local markets as food. Further south, the birds – back in their bright plumage – are prized for their beauty and effervescent song, and are caged as pets in the fashionable salons of Buenos Aries and Lima.
When I learned all this, asking my neighbour to delay his hay cutting seemed the least I could do. But there was a catch. “The nutritional quality of the hay declines the longer you wait [to harvest it],” McCracken tells me, “though with a delay of a just week or two, the decline is minimal.” Not enough to worry a beef farmer like Dave, but of some concern to dairy farmers whose livestock has higher nutritional needs.
The good news, according to McCracken, is that “by delaying cutting by one week or 10 days, you go from zero percent nesting success to a success rate of 80 percent or more. It’s a remarkable change, and it would be a significant thing for a farmer to do.” Many farmers, McCracken adds, are unaware of the toll early hay harvests take on these birds. That is why it is crucial to raise awareness about the plight of the bobolink and other grassland species, such as the grasshopper sparrow and eastern meadowlark (see sidebar at left), all of which are under pressure from changing agricultural practices. The Henslow’s sparrow, for example, has been reduced to fewer than 50 pairs in Ontario, and various groups are now fighting to save this small, shy bird.
“It would be good to get the word out to farmers and landowners,” McCracken continues. “I think a lot of farmers do care about birds. They are interested in being good stewards of the land.” Besides, he points out, “bobolinks are the farmer’s friend. They eat vast quantities of harmful insects and [at least in Ontario] they do no harm.”
McCracken suggests that a mechanism should be available to compensate farmers for any losses they might incur from delaying their harvest. To find out if such programs exist (in case my neighbour balked at my request), I called Andrew Graham, program manager for the Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association (OSCIA) at his Guelph, Ont., office. OSCIA disburses funding under the provincial government’s Environmental Farm Program. Graham said that while his group is committed to helping farmers protect wildlife habitat on farms – by offering subsidies to fence livestock out of woodlots and wetlands, for instance – it will not pay a farmer to delay hay cutting.
OSCIA distributes material on the impact of hay cutting on birds, but it stops there. “I have no problem at all with trying to persuade farmers to delay cutting their hay,” Graham tells me. “Our problem is coming up with a fair way of sharing costs [with the farmer] in something like this.” The only program he is aware of that might apply is one for upland and riparian habitat management under the Canada-Ontairo Canadian Farm Stewardship Program. This offers to pay 50 percent of the cost (up to a maximum of $20,000) to farmers wishing to take a portion of cropland out of production and convert it to native species of forest, shrubs or grasses.
“It’s not widely used,” he admits.” And then, almost by way of apology, he adds, “We can’t do everything.”
Given that the environmental bureaucrats were not addressing the well-documented decline of the bobolink, I was beginning to wonder if anyone besides me cared at all. I called my friend Barb the birder, and she suggested I contact her friends, Frances and Donald MacFarlane, who live on 30 hectares of derelict farmland near Shelburne, Ont. Bobolinks, Frances tells me, were there in great numbers 18 years ago when the couple purchased the property.
“They were such fun, so exuberant,” says Frances, that the MacFarlanes were disappointed when the birds failed to come back a few years later. “We asked around,” she says, “and decided that it was because the hay hadn’t been cut for a few years. So we decided to cut the grass once a year, in October, long after the bobolinks have gone – and sure enough, they returned in the spring.”
Apparently, bobolinks prefer habitat that is mowed regularly, just not during June, which, I was only too aware, was fast approaching as I worked up the nerve to call Dave and deliver my save-the-birds speech.
“It’s because of the bobolinks,” I explain to Dave after asking him to delay the hay harvest on our fields.
“Bobolinks,” he says. “Is that what you call them?”
To my delight, he seemed almost relieved by my request and proceeded to describe the way gulls follow his tractor, swooping in and plucking the helpless fledglings as their nests are exposed by the mower.
“I’ve always hated that,” he tells me.
And so last year, Dave delayed cutting our hay until the end of the first week in July. By then, the male bobolinks’ jubilant chorus was over; so was the hard work of feeding their clutches of demanding young. The males had begun to moult and were now almost indistinguishable from their mates. I had no way of knowing, as I looked out over the round bales turning golden in the midsummer sun, whether the baby birds had survived. But I like to think they did and that they will return in the spring, bold and beautiful and ready to begin again.
I know my land is not much – a few fields in a far corner of Dufferin County that hereafter will be a haven where a few dozen bobolinks can raise their young. But the effort is worthwhile, if only so that my as-yet unborn grandchildren may one day be able to lie in the long grass on a cloudless June day and listen to the bobolinks sing.
All about Bobolinks
Some facts about a fascinating bird: male bobolinks arrive in Ontario in mid-May and set about establishing their territories in open fields. Females join them a week later. Males defend their turf aggressively by singing and chasing away rival males. Actual physical combat between them, however, is rare.
Bobolinks are a highly dimorphic species – the males and females look very different. During the breeding season, males are a sleek black with a yellow head patch and bold white patterns on their backs. However, before fall migration, they moult into a nondescript striped brown plumage like that of the females.
Bobolinks are polygamous – a single male will often mate with several females in his territory. He will, however, help with feeding the young only in his primary nest. “Helper” birds of either sex (usually younger birds that have not paired off) assist in feeding the other nestlings. Bobolinks build their nests on the ground, hidden in long grass. The females lay three to seven blue-grey eggs speckled with reddish brown. Incubation takes approximately 13 days; hatching occurs between June 7 and 20. The fledglings leave the nest before they are ready to fly, at about 10 days old. They are not capable of sustained flight until they are 16 days old.
The summer diet of bobolinks consists mainly of insects, including beetles, grasshoppers, caterpillars, wasps, ants, spiders and millipedes. They also eat some weed and grass seeds. During migration, they feed heavily on rice and millet, and are considered a major agricultural pest in regions where these crops are grown.
The species is one of the few songbirds that have two moulting periods. One occurs on their wintering grounds in South America, beginning in late January, and results in the males’ showy spring plumage. The second moult takes place in late July, when the males revert to basic brown and white.
Grassland birds
With its distinctive song and plumage, the bobolink is the perfect poster species for the ongoing effort to protect North America’s grassland birds, many of which are declining steeply in numbers. In Ontario, the threatened species include the vesper sparrow, grasshopper sparrow, Henslow’s sparrow, Le Conte’s sparrow, sedge wren, horned lark, upland sandpiper, short-eared owl, eastern meadowlark and western meadowlark.
According to the U.S. State of the Birds, a comprehensive report produced in 2009 by thirteen U.S. conservation and wildlife agencies (including The Nature Conservancy), grassland birds “are among the fastest and most consistently declining birds in North America.” The main cause of their decline is loss of habitat. Ideal nesting grounds for these birds are the native prairie grasslands that once stretched across the continent. The birds build their nests – usually shallow open cups of grass and weed stems – on the ground, hidden among thick grass and weeds. In the past 100 years, however, 95 percent of the tallgrass prairie in North America has been converted to agricultural uses. Many grassland species adapted well to the hayfields, pastures and lush fallow fields that resulted, but intensification of agriculture in the past 20 years is taking a severe toll on their numbers, and species declines of anywhere from 37 percent to 78 percent have occurred since 1968.
How can you help? Spread the word and, if you are a landowner, take steps to ensure that hay cropping is delayed, ideally by a week to 10 days. Doing so will ensure that most of the fledglings have left the nest, preventing their almost certain death from the mower blades or predators. Any delay in cutting will benefit nesting grassland birds by increasing the percentage that fledge successfully.
To find out more about bobolinks
A good place to see bobolinks and other grassland birds in Ontario is at the Carden Plain, a rare alvar habitat where other endangered species, such as the loggerhead shrike and the Henslow’s sparrow, also live. The plain is located about two hours north of Toronto. Alvars are natural open habitats with thin soil over a rocky base. BirdLife International designated the Carden Alvar as an Important Bird Area (IBA). About 238 bird species, 450 plant species, 142 butterfly and dragonfly species inhabit the alvar. For more information and directions, visit the Carden Plain IBA website, www.cardenplainimportantbirdarea.com.
You can also learn more about bobolinks from these sources:
Bird Studies Canada: www.bsc-eoc.org
Migration Research Foundation: www.migrationresearch.org/research/grassland.html
Ontario Field Ornithologists: www.ofo.ca
Environmental Canada’s Migratory Bird Conservation: www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca/birds/trends/disclaimer_e.cfm
Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario: www.birdsontario.org/atlas/atlasmain.html
Canadian Migration Monitoring Network:
www.bsc-eoc.org/national/cmmn.html
Ontario Partners in Flight:
www.bsc-eoc.org/PIF/PIFOntario.html
North American Bird Conservation Initiative: www.nabci.net
Partners in Flight – U.S.: www.partnersinflight.org
Wildlife Watchers Programs: www.on.ec.gc.ca/wildlife/programs-e.html
Wildspace Ontario: www.on.ec.gc.ca/wildlife/wildspace/intro-e.html
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Bobolink concerns
Male Bobolink
Female Bobolink
In some an earlier post, I shared the link from Bird Studies Canada that "The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) has recommended that Bobolink be added to Canada’s list of species at risk."
Then I recently learned that the fields where we observe the Bobolinks in spring are slated for development. Of course I found this very upsetting since habitat loss is the main threat to this species. I've emailed BSC and COSEWIC to inform them about this situation, provided a map showing where we've observed the birds and offered to provide dates of observation etc. So far, no response. The one field in particular has recently had a barn razed, so I'm feeling concerned that there's a time issue here. I hope to hear from someone soon. If anyone has suggestions as to other agencies I should contact, please let me know. It's disheartening when we wait until it's too late to take action to preserve habitat and save species.
Monday, July 12, 2010
MacGregor Point Sightings
We spent a few days camping at MacGregor Point Provincial Park and had a great time! An excellent park all around- very clean, great trails, friendly staff. Very beautiful scenery as well. The campsites are quite private, surrounded by trees and this allowed for birdwatching right on our site. In fact, we had our best view of a Black and White Warbler ever and it was just working his way down a tree behind our tent. We also had a male Winter Wren just behind our site as well. He sang his heart out for us each morning and what a lovely song! That was also a new addition to our life list as well, so it was an added bonus.
Here's the list for the weekend:
Friday (late afternoon-early evening)
Upland Sandpiper (observed outside of Arthur, ON)- new to our life list
Am Robins
Am Redstarts (Male and Female- and just a note that we have never seen so many Redstarts in one place!)
Winter Wren
Red-Eyed Vireo (another new addition to the life list. I know they are common, but we have never before observed them and been 100% sure of the ID. There were quite a few of these around, including a mother attending to a nest of babies).
N. Flicker, including a parent feeding a fledgling
Chipping Sparrows
Cedar Waxwings
Am Gold Finch
Hairy Woodpecker
Ruby-Throated Hummingbird
Catbirds
Brown Creeper
Grackles
Red-winged Blackbirds
Eastern Phoebe
Red-breasted Nuthatch
Chickadees
Saturday
Robins
Winter Wren
Northern Flicker
Am Crow
Chipping Sparrows
Am. Redstarts
belted Kingfisher
Great-crested Flycatcher
Eastern Wood Peewee
Catbirds
Yellow Warbler
Blue Jays
Song Sparrow
Common Yellowthroat (male)
Canada Goose
Least Flycatcher (new to life list!!)
Red-eyed Vireo
Yellow Warbler
White-throated Sparrow
Black and White Warbler
Mourning Dove
and we heard a Whip-poor-will calling as we fell asleep that night.
Sunday
Red-eyed Vireo
Pileated Woodpecker
Flicker
Chickadees
Robins
Cedar Waxwings
Winter Wren
2 Great Blue Herons flying above, one adult and one juvenile, where the juvenile was calling out to the adult. First time we've seen a fledgling Heron!
Fox Sparrow
Northern Rough-winged Sparrow
Killdeer
An Egret- it was flying overhead as we were on the beach. Due to the size, we think it was a Great Egret, but we did not get a good look to confirm this, which is too bad b/c it would be our first Egret. We can't add it to our official list. Boo!
Am Redstarts
Friday, July 9, 2010
Eastern Kingbirds
On Wednesday morning, we had a family of Kingbirds in the trees in the front yard- two adults and at least one fledgling. The adults were chasing the Blue Jays and making a clicking noise. The Jays were just coming in for their peanut breakfast, but the Kingbirds were not having it. The power struggle went on for quite some time and the Jays stayed back until the Kingbirds moved on. It's the first time we've seen Kingbirds in the front and so close to the feeders. We usually see them out back, perched in one of the dead trees. Nice to know they are nesting nearby.
Cool Facts (from http://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Eastern_Kingbird/lifehistory)
* The Eastern Kingbird is highly aggressive toward nest predators and larger birds. Hawks and crows are attacked regularly. A kingbird was observed to knock a Blue Jay out of a tree and cause it to hide under bush to escape the attack.
* During the summer the Eastern Kingbird eats mostly flying insects and maintains a breeding territory that it defends vigorously against all other kingbirds. In the winter along the Amazon, however, it has a completely different lifestyle: it travels in flocks and eats fruit
* Parent Eastern Kingbirds feed their young for about seven weeks. Because of this relatively long period of dependence, a pair generally raises only one brood of young per nesting season.
Habitat:
* Breeds in open environments with scattered perches, such as fields, orchards, shelterbelts, and forest edges. Uses urban parks and golf courses.
* Winters in river- and lake-edge habitats and canopy of tropical forests.
Food: Flying insects, fruits especially in winter.
Clutch Size: 2–5 eggs
Egg Description: Creamy white with heavy dark spots, concentrated around large end.
Nest Description: Nest an open cup of twigs, roots, dry weed stems, and strips of bark lined with plant down, fine rootlets, and hair. Nest placed on horizontal limb in tree, in crotch of tree limb, or on top of snag or fence post.
Widespread and common, but populations may be decreasing.
Enough with the golf courses people.
Developer charged in razing of 118 moraine trees
Aurora worries about precedent set at golf course project still awaiting approval
Published On Thu Jul 08 2010 Jasmeet Sidhu Staff Reporter
The Town of Aurora has filed several charges against a development company and its two owners after claims that more than 100 trees were destroyed to make way for a golf course before it was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board.
The town says 118 trees, including ash, pine, cedar, maple and oak, were injured or destroyed in the area of Leslie St. and Bloomington Rd., without a permit.
A resident complained June 17, the city says. After an investigation, nine charges were filed against West Hill Redevelopment Company Ltd. and its principals Joe and Wilf Lebovic.
The allegations highlight a flaw in municipal and provincial regulations that often makes it cheaper for developers to pay fines for making unapproved land alterations and proceed with their projects, rather than go through years of applications and appeals.
The project in question was initially put forward almost 12 years ago and rejected by the town in 2008. That decision is being appealed before the OMB.
If convicted, the developers face a maximum fine of $100,000 for violating the town’s tree-cutting and zoning bylaws.
Aurora Mayor Phyllis Morris is outraged at the precedent this case sets for other developers.
“Once you cut down trees and the land is cleared, what’s left to a town council and a mayor who wants to have protected them? We believed in the moraine legislation; we believed the region’s tree-cutting bylaw, the town’s tree-cutting bylaw, and the TRCA (Toronto and Region Conservation Authority) oversight would have been sufficient to deter someone,” Morris says.
“We are concerned that if this becomes the normal practice, then doesn’t that negate a town trying to protect its environment? You just hope people would follow the rules.”
The project, an 18-hole golf course and 75-unit condominium complex on both sides of Leslie St. north of Bloomington Rd., has a long and complicated history with the town.
The property would fall under the provincial Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, but because the project dates back so far, it’s subject to the regulations in effect before the plan became law in 2001. The town says it will adversely affect ground aquifers and adjoining woodlots and wetlands. Many homes in Aurora use well water drawn from the deep aquifers below.
David Donnelly, a lawyer for Environmental Defence, a non-profit based in Toronto, says he has seen many cases where a developer is alleged to have altered land in advance of an OMB decision to quicken or circumvent the approvals process.
“It’s a rare occurrence but it happens commonly enough that I think we need to tighten the rules around altering subject properties,” Donnelly says.
“Cutting trees in advance of an Ontario Municipal Board hearing or a court process robs the decision-maker of the opportunity to hear a complete defence of the environment.
“Most importantly, it takes away from the public’s right to have the environmental laws that we have in place applied fairly.”
Maureen Carter-Whitney, research director at the Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy, agrees: “I believe the penalty should be so high people aren’t willing the chance of committing these kind of offences. To me, it points out a huge flaw in the system.”
West Hill did not respond Thursday to numerous attempts by the Star to contact the company for comment. The corporation is expected to appear at a Newmarket court Monday.
Aurora worries about precedent set at golf course project still awaiting approval
Published On Thu Jul 08 2010 Jasmeet Sidhu Staff Reporter
The Town of Aurora has filed several charges against a development company and its two owners after claims that more than 100 trees were destroyed to make way for a golf course before it was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board.
The town says 118 trees, including ash, pine, cedar, maple and oak, were injured or destroyed in the area of Leslie St. and Bloomington Rd., without a permit.
A resident complained June 17, the city says. After an investigation, nine charges were filed against West Hill Redevelopment Company Ltd. and its principals Joe and Wilf Lebovic.
The allegations highlight a flaw in municipal and provincial regulations that often makes it cheaper for developers to pay fines for making unapproved land alterations and proceed with their projects, rather than go through years of applications and appeals.
The project in question was initially put forward almost 12 years ago and rejected by the town in 2008. That decision is being appealed before the OMB.
If convicted, the developers face a maximum fine of $100,000 for violating the town’s tree-cutting and zoning bylaws.
Aurora Mayor Phyllis Morris is outraged at the precedent this case sets for other developers.
“Once you cut down trees and the land is cleared, what’s left to a town council and a mayor who wants to have protected them? We believed in the moraine legislation; we believed the region’s tree-cutting bylaw, the town’s tree-cutting bylaw, and the TRCA (Toronto and Region Conservation Authority) oversight would have been sufficient to deter someone,” Morris says.
“We are concerned that if this becomes the normal practice, then doesn’t that negate a town trying to protect its environment? You just hope people would follow the rules.”
The project, an 18-hole golf course and 75-unit condominium complex on both sides of Leslie St. north of Bloomington Rd., has a long and complicated history with the town.
The property would fall under the provincial Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, but because the project dates back so far, it’s subject to the regulations in effect before the plan became law in 2001. The town says it will adversely affect ground aquifers and adjoining woodlots and wetlands. Many homes in Aurora use well water drawn from the deep aquifers below.
David Donnelly, a lawyer for Environmental Defence, a non-profit based in Toronto, says he has seen many cases where a developer is alleged to have altered land in advance of an OMB decision to quicken or circumvent the approvals process.
“It’s a rare occurrence but it happens commonly enough that I think we need to tighten the rules around altering subject properties,” Donnelly says.
“Cutting trees in advance of an Ontario Municipal Board hearing or a court process robs the decision-maker of the opportunity to hear a complete defence of the environment.
“Most importantly, it takes away from the public’s right to have the environmental laws that we have in place applied fairly.”
Maureen Carter-Whitney, research director at the Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy, agrees: “I believe the penalty should be so high people aren’t willing the chance of committing these kind of offences. To me, it points out a huge flaw in the system.”
West Hill did not respond Thursday to numerous attempts by the Star to contact the company for comment. The corporation is expected to appear at a Newmarket court Monday.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/832748--pickering-nuclear-plant-ordered-to-quit-killing-fish?bn=1
Pickering nuclear plant ordered to quit killing fish
Millions of adults, eggs and larvae perish when sucked into intakes or shocked by cold water
Published On Tue Jul 06 2010
The Pickering nuclear power plant is killing fish by the millions.
Close to one million fish and 62 million fish eggs and larvae die each year when they’re sucked into the water intake channel in Lake Ontario, which the plant uses to cool steam condensers.
The fish, which include alewife, northern pike, Chinook salmon and rainbow smelt, are killed when they’re trapped on intake screens or suffer cold water shock after leaving warmer water that’s discharged into the lake.
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has told Ontario Power Generation, which operates the plant, to reduce fish mortality by 80 per cent. And in renewing Pickering A station’s operating licence last month, the nuclear regulator asked for annual public reports on fish mortality and the effectiveness of steps OPG is taking to reduce rates.
“Quite clearly we were talking about a lot of fish,” says a spokesperson for the commission, adding that while the kill has been going on “forever,” environmental issues were only recently added to licensing considerations.
But while the requirement for regular reports is a “huge start,” says an environmental watchdog, OPG hasn’t done enough to stop what he calls the “biggest killer of fish on the lake.”
A 610-metre barrier net it has strung in front of the channel is insufficient because it’s removed in winter and “does nothing about thermal pollution and nothing about larvae and eggs,” says Mark Mattson, president of Lake Ontario Waterkeeper, a grassroots charity working to protect the health of the lake.
“This is important to the lake’s ecosystem — the birds and people who eat the fish, and the commercial fishery,” he said in an interview. “What a terrible precedent it is that one of the biggest public corporations can just ignore the rules for fish and fish habitat in Canada.”
Mattson calls the plant’s cooling system the worst of available technologies.
“It sucks in clean water along with fish, eggs and larvae, then spits it back at close to hot-tub temperatures.”
The combined thermal plume from Pickering stations A and B ranges from 150 to 800 hectares at the water surface year round, and 50 to 300 hectares at the bottom during cold weather, he said.
But OPG denies plant operations are having an adverse effect on aquatic life or habitat and maintains there’s no evidence that thermal emissions are killing fish.
The agency installed the net and is monitoring mortality rates and lake temperatures because “we’re always looking for ways to reduce the impact on the environment,” said spokesperson Ted Gruetzner.
After four months, it’s too soon to say how effective the net is, but already fewer large fish are being seen. Small swimmers can still get through.
Installed last October, the net was removed for the winter because of the risks to divers doing maintenance work, Gruetzner explained, adding that fish are less likely to enter the channel in cold weather.
Noting that OPG spends more than $1 million a year on habitat projects in the province, he said the operator will consider stocking the lake with fish to replace those killed.
The nuclear safety commission told OPG in October 2008 to fix the problem, reducing mortality for adult fish by 80 per cent and for eggs and larvae by 60 per cent. Citing the company’s failure to protect the lake’s inhabitants, the commission called the fish kill “an unreasonable risk to the environment.”
The Darlington nuclear plant uses a different intake system that doesn’t draw fish in.
Pickering nuclear plant ordered to quit killing fish
Millions of adults, eggs and larvae perish when sucked into intakes or shocked by cold water
Published On Tue Jul 06 2010
The Pickering nuclear power plant is killing fish by the millions.
Close to one million fish and 62 million fish eggs and larvae die each year when they’re sucked into the water intake channel in Lake Ontario, which the plant uses to cool steam condensers.
The fish, which include alewife, northern pike, Chinook salmon and rainbow smelt, are killed when they’re trapped on intake screens or suffer cold water shock after leaving warmer water that’s discharged into the lake.
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has told Ontario Power Generation, which operates the plant, to reduce fish mortality by 80 per cent. And in renewing Pickering A station’s operating licence last month, the nuclear regulator asked for annual public reports on fish mortality and the effectiveness of steps OPG is taking to reduce rates.
“Quite clearly we were talking about a lot of fish,” says a spokesperson for the commission, adding that while the kill has been going on “forever,” environmental issues were only recently added to licensing considerations.
But while the requirement for regular reports is a “huge start,” says an environmental watchdog, OPG hasn’t done enough to stop what he calls the “biggest killer of fish on the lake.”
A 610-metre barrier net it has strung in front of the channel is insufficient because it’s removed in winter and “does nothing about thermal pollution and nothing about larvae and eggs,” says Mark Mattson, president of Lake Ontario Waterkeeper, a grassroots charity working to protect the health of the lake.
“This is important to the lake’s ecosystem — the birds and people who eat the fish, and the commercial fishery,” he said in an interview. “What a terrible precedent it is that one of the biggest public corporations can just ignore the rules for fish and fish habitat in Canada.”
Mattson calls the plant’s cooling system the worst of available technologies.
“It sucks in clean water along with fish, eggs and larvae, then spits it back at close to hot-tub temperatures.”
The combined thermal plume from Pickering stations A and B ranges from 150 to 800 hectares at the water surface year round, and 50 to 300 hectares at the bottom during cold weather, he said.
But OPG denies plant operations are having an adverse effect on aquatic life or habitat and maintains there’s no evidence that thermal emissions are killing fish.
The agency installed the net and is monitoring mortality rates and lake temperatures because “we’re always looking for ways to reduce the impact on the environment,” said spokesperson Ted Gruetzner.
After four months, it’s too soon to say how effective the net is, but already fewer large fish are being seen. Small swimmers can still get through.
Installed last October, the net was removed for the winter because of the risks to divers doing maintenance work, Gruetzner explained, adding that fish are less likely to enter the channel in cold weather.
Noting that OPG spends more than $1 million a year on habitat projects in the province, he said the operator will consider stocking the lake with fish to replace those killed.
The nuclear safety commission told OPG in October 2008 to fix the problem, reducing mortality for adult fish by 80 per cent and for eggs and larvae by 60 per cent. Citing the company’s failure to protect the lake’s inhabitants, the commission called the fish kill “an unreasonable risk to the environment.”
The Darlington nuclear plant uses a different intake system that doesn’t draw fish in.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)